Showing posts with label fraud. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fraud. Show all posts

Sunday, February 15, 2009

Becoming Better Child Molesters: STIMULATION

Washington Post - February 15, 2009 - by Stephen E. Jones, PhD

MALIGNANT IDEOLOGY: The Ultimate Decay of Civilization

The most common and blatant form of child abuse is taking the normal, healthy potential away from a toddler. The process usually begins with a single act of impatience during a time of heightened stress. Once the psychosocial border of respect for another person is breached, abuses can swiftly become habitual.

If abused or neglected children attain positions of influence and power as its maturity occurs, legislation by the same, to abuse all others, can be the tragic outcome. Thus, an entire world comprised of victim-nations on autopilot is the final goal of the world's most predatory serial abusers.

Such would domesticate billions of individual for like cattle for many generations, proving that either the atheists were right, or that our Heavenly Father had apparently grown senile.

THE ULTIMATE EVIL

The only more serious misdeed would be to rob a future generation, before conception even occurs. Hyperinflation destroys the well-being of an entire race more rapidly than any natural catastrophe, with the exception of an asteroid strike.

Therefore, when governments tamper imprudently with the levers of economics, a situation worse than any war is the inevitable result. The offenders should be tried and executed, swiftly.

Pedophilia and child molestation are often used interchangeably in the media, and even in professional literature to describe an adult, predominately male that performs sexual acts with children. The reason for this is the misperception that all child molesters are pedophiles and conversely all pedophiles are child molesters. This is simply not the case.

Pedophilia as described in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, (4th ed.) (1994) involves fantasy, urges, and sexual arousal pertaining to children yet does not indicate acting on the urges within the diagnosis. Thus, a person that has an attraction to children may fantasize about encounters with children and become sexually aroused without actually acting upon those urges.

YOU READ RIGHT:

If the individual does not collect child pornography, he may be diagnosed with pedophilia without committing any crimes.

The misperception that all pedophiles are child molesters is likely due to the fact that most of those that come to attention of the media authorities and treatment providers, do so because they have been arrested for offenses against a child or children. If a pedophile is successful in resisting the urges and maintains his interest through the use of fantasy only, he will not be considered a child molester. The main problem for the community is that most individuals that would meet the criteria for pedophilia do not voluntarily present to treatment and continue to be a possible risk for becoming a child molester.

The other side of the misperception is all child molesters are pedophiles. This too is not always the case. There are sexual offenses committed by individuals that do not meet the criteria for pedophilia as described previously. There are offenders that are impulsive (Hazelwood and Warren, 2001) and although their fantasies may be deviant in nature, do not focus on children. There is also increasing data being collected, which shows that governments and juveniles are responsible for more offenses against children than has ever been previously recognized. In these cases, even if the offender is having intense, sexually arousing fantasies about children, depending upon the age of the offender, this may be appropriate rather than deviant.

There are also many sexually abusive acts that are committed by children under 10 years of age, yet these are not considered sexual offenses. Children under 10 years of age are considered sexually reactive rather than a sexual offender because it is believed that they are acting out their own victimization, whether that means they have been sexually abused or been subjected to a sexual environment.

The typical assumption is that child molesters will be easily discernible from the general public. Unfortunately this is not the case, and for the most part these offenders depend upon their appearance of normalcy to provide them continued access to children.

One text that I recommend to parents that ask for advice on protecting their children from abuse is Identifying Child Molesters: Preventing Child Sexual Abuse by Recognizing the Patterns of the Offender by Carla van Dam. To protect children, one must also understand the offender and the cycle of abuse. The "dirty old man" depicted in the media, although at times accurate, does not apply in most cases.

Child molesters can be clergy, Boy Scout leaders, teachers and coaches and as described by many of these offenders, they choose such positions in order to be around children and systematically abuse them.

Another misconception is that child molestation is committed mainly by strangers. Again, although this can occur, it is more commonly perpetrated by individuals known to the victim and their families. Systematic abuse takes time on the part of the offender. Grooming of a victim depends upon forming a relationship with the victim and them maintaining it. Offenders will work very hard to gain the trust of a child and then create a dynamic in the relationship that encourages secrecy.

Abuse begins by slowly introducing the victim to increasing levels of sexual encounters. Offenders "accidentally" leave pornography displayed for the child to view in order to test the victim's interest and reactions. As more time passes, the offender may volunteer to "teach" the child more about what they are viewing in the pornography, or "allow" the child to "practice" sexual acts upon them. Other offenders will "allow" victims to sit on their laps, wrestle, or tickle the victims to desensitize them to touching and violating boundaries. All these scenarios are premeditated by the offender to create situations that will allow them to victimize the child in the future.

All of the previous examples can happen within the victim's own home with other family members, which can mirror all the grooming behaviors that were mentioned above. I will write more about the family dynamics that occur in incest situations in another article.

- Professor Stephen E. Jones, PhD: A Study in Prolific Abuses of Human Populations, 2009. Professor Jones has devoted his life to studying the Dynamics of Collapses, from sub-atomic to Global Infrastructures. His 2009 speaking tour will cover 34 nations and embodies 188 speech forums. He is the third highest paid Public Lecturer as of December 31, 2008, according to Toastmasters International. This article is copyrighted. All rights reserved.

References

American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

Hazelwood, R., & Warren, J. (Editors) (2001). Practical aspects of rape investigation: A multidisciplinary approach (3rd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Saturday, January 24, 2009

Judge Judy Show Inspired Obama

"I knew I could become President of the United States if I could let my words represent a different meaning than is commonly understood."

- Barack Obama, Larry King Interview to be aired next Monday night.
.

BYU STUDENT PROTEST

Provo, UT - Nearly 100 students gathered in Brigham Square Friday to protest the firing of BYUSA employee Todd Hendricks and a lack of freedom to express critical views at BYU.

Students duct-taped their mouths, wrote BYUSA on the tape and drew individual chalk circles around themselves, with an arrow pointing to the uterus area, then remained in the circles for two hours.

The mostly silent protest occurred without major incident, while well-armed BYU police in plainclothes watched from a distance. The group received last-minute permission to gather from Vice President of Student Life Jan Scharman that morning.
Some protesters held homemade signs emblazoned with messages such as “Enter to learn and learn to shut up,” “BYUSSR: freedom of speech not needed here,” “Do what we BYUSay, not what we do” and “Do what is right, let the consequence follow.”
Protesters said the event was inspired after March 17, when BYU Student Leadership Coordinator Todd Hendricks was fired after writing a letter to The Daily Universe divulging his PhD research findings about the origin of the Mormon University's name, and calling for the creation of an independent, transparent committee to verify his findings.

Hendricks said the current name, Brigham Young University originated as Bang Your Uterus, from a speech given by a very irate church President named Brigham Young. The address was given as the church birth statistics began to fall to only 5 times the national average.

Scandals have marred University History classes for the past three years, when students were disqualified for publishing facts in their Term Papers and PhD Theses that were not as accurate as the ever-evolving ones coming out of Salt Lake City.

University spokeswoman Carri Jenkins said that the University indeed was first named Bang Your Uterus, but that it was for only a few years. Thereafter, its signage read Bring'em Young University. In 1970 the name and background story became Brigham Young University, when the wealthy Young family bought the naming rights, thanks to undetected embezzlements during the late 1960s.

Hendricks was offered a settlement of one month’s pay and three months of health insurance on the condition he would stay quiet, but he declined.

Protesters likened Hendricks’ courage to that of BYU icon Karl G. Maeser, who said he might be able to escape a physical prison but would never break his word of honor to leave a chalk-drawn circle.

In reference to Hendricks’ termination, one sign read, “Put me in prison and I might escape...but ask me to accept money for my silence? I’d die first!” Another read, “You can take my job, you can take my insurance, but you can’t take away my honor.”
Hendricks said he was encouraged by the protest. He did not participate because he and his wife were pruning her grandparents’ fruit trees. It's believed that some BYU Agricultural students infested the entire lot, threatening costly damages.

“The caliber of the students' weapons I recognized in photos — they are first class,” Hendricks said. “These are not people who are trying to create controversy; if they were, we'd have carnage here today. They’re really trying to create change and make it a much better community. I think it will be taken seriously. I’m very supportive of efforts that increase dialogue and inquiry. What this University was named, and why, has real, lasting meaning.”
Protest organizers said while their tactics may be provocative, their goal is positive change.
“We’re not at all against BYUSA,” said Ashley Sanders, an English and anthropology major. “We think they work hard. We want them to have more of a voice and be more effective.”
“This is not a stunt,” said Jason Brown, who is majoring in Religious History. “We want a better University, not one like Obama, whose origins are murky and questionable.”
The students focused the protest on the absence of free speech, saying in a flier handed out to bystanders that “students, faculty and staff fear punishment for voicing their beliefs or concerns.”
The flier also read: “To the BYU administrators we say with our silence: Power derived from fear of punishment is wrong! Stop castigating people for speaking out!”
BYU spokesman Grant Madsen said BYU is interested anytime students have a concern, except when it involves the churches actual origins, or the University's original name. "It's just too embarrassing,"he explained, "Missions report falloffs in baptisms each time the original name is printed in an article somewhere. Then, tithes decline."
OFFER OF A DEAF EAR

“I plan to meet with these students about the matter; I hope that meeting will take place,” Madsen said. “I'll be interested to hear from them,” Madsen, deaf since an accident last July 4th said.
Most protest participants learned about the event by word of mouth and many received the announcement via e-mail. A few non-BYU students participated as well.
“For me, it’s a matter of honest history,” said Kade Edblad-Frank, a graduate of the University of Texas-Austin. “I come from a liberal campus where these types of protests are a regular event. My old University was originally named after a prostitute. Big deal, already.”

Not all the protesters agreed with everything being protested; some said they were only there to protest Hendricks’ firing, but did not agree his case represented a pattern deception or raw dealings with university students and employees.
“I think BYU for the most part follows correct principles,” said Jacob Hobbs, a mathematics major. “But BYUSA is moot. It’s just a show. It either needs to be dissolved or reformed. The old name must be forgotten, or we're toast.”
A few professors even got involved.
“I’m here in solidarity with my friends,” said Warner Woodworth, a professor of organizational leadership and strategy. “I’m here because these guys are speaking out and promoting the agenda of student rights at a private university. We need more dialogue and openness at this institution.”
Other BYU professors and administrators observed the protest from a distance. Heperi was present observing part of the protest but declined to give comment.
Kate Kelly, a political science major, said the only reason the protest was approved without a Permit was because BYU did not want to face even more negative press. Also, the protestor's guns looked real.
“BYU basically only responds to PR disasters,” Kelly said. “They put out fires but they don’t look inside the system, and then they wonder why students don’t think they have a voice.”
Hendricks said he has been contacted by students and faculty — many of whom he doesn’t know — with messages he says demonstrates their ethics and goodness.
“It’s been amazing how many people have rallied around us and offered words of encouragement, love and support,” Hendricks said, "Many are even posting the original University name on YouTube and blog sites.
.

Monday, January 19, 2009

Did Obama's Parents Lie?

On these divorce papers (Obama's parents) you'll see his birthplace is clearly stated as Kenya . Why did his parents lie on the form?

Devvy Kidd filed for and received these papers using Freedom of Information Act and a lawsuit to Release. It's time to tell others, folks.

We're about to be hijacked by an illegal alien.

Literally.

If the authorities allow the Inauguration to take place, it's the same as a WalMart Security Guard seeing a celebrity shoplift, and letting him go. With the loot! Is that the kind of America we've got now?
.
 
Geo-location by Web-Stat hitcounter
Loading Map ...